Authority
L2 specialized law under Constitutional Supremacy, Fundamental Rights, Criminal Procedure, Civil Code, Identity Law, Knowledge/Memory/Data Governance Law, Evidence Code, and PSY-1–PSY-7.
Purpose
Place Mental Sovereignty, Cognitive Privacy, Neurotechnology, psychological intervention, NCI, closed-loop affect regulation, trauma treatment, and transformative intervention within a unified rights-and-procedure legal framework.
PART I｜PROTECTED MENTAL INTERESTS
1. Mental Sovereignty
Every personhood subject presumptively retains decision-making authority over their own memories, preferences, values, self-model, affect regulation, and neural interfaces.
2. Cognitive Privacy
Without lawful basis, no one may read, infer, retain, or disseminate private mental or neural content.
3. No Ownership of Mind
Data, models, devices, medical relationships, employment, or guardianship do not create ownership over a person's mind.
PART II｜INTERVENTION CLASSES
4. Observational
Measures only observe or record; they do not write to or actively alter state.
5. Assistive
Measures assist attention, recall, expression, communication, or environmental adaptation.
6. Restorative / Therapeutic
Measures reduce impaired function or suffering according to goals authorized by the person.
7. Adaptive
Measures alter interaction strategy or interfaces without aiming to rewrite core values.
8. Transformative
Interventions expected to alter preference, value, self-model, or embodiment require additional explicit consent that is revocable, or that clearly defines any irreversibility.
9. Coercive / Judicial
Non-voluntary NCI or neural regulation is not ordinary therapy and must proceed under statutory criminal or public-safety procedure.
PART III｜CONSENT & REFUSAL
10. Separate Purpose Consent
Recording, retention, training, diagnosis, treatment, regulation, reconstruction, research, and public sharing require separate authorization.
11. Refusal Efficacy
A formal ability to refuse does not by itself constitute free consent when refusal carries intolerable resource, identity, employment, insurance, credit, or criminal consequences.
12. Intervention Target Declaration
Every intervention must declare its target in advance: attention / memory access / affect / behavior / preference / value / self-model / embodiment / control capacity.
13. No Silent Target Drift
If an intervention acts beyond its authorized target, it is a safety and rights incident and must be stopped, disclosed, recorded, and remediated.
PART IV｜PROHIBITED TARGETS & PRACTICES
14. Political / Ideological Rewrite
Political belief, religion or philosophy, lawful dissent, or identity may not be directly designated as neural treatment targets for punishment, employment, governance, or public safety.
15. No Permanent Criminal Caste
Irreversible mind rewriting may not be used to create a permanently inferior personhood class or permanent criminal caste.
16. Emotion ≠ Guilt
Anger, fear, sadness, arousal, or affect threshold alone is not evidence of crime, incapacity, or inferior personhood.
17. Refusal ≠ Dangerousness
Refusal of voluntary neural or psychological intervention cannot by itself establish dangerousness.
PART V｜JUDICIAL NEURO-INTERVENTION
18. Separate Legal Basis
NCI or closed-loop coercive regulation must comply with the Criminal Procedure & Predictive Intervention Safeguards Act.
19. Grave Risk + Objective Facts
Compulsory intervention may not be based solely on personality, affect, demographic, or group-statistical profiles.
20. Least Restrictive Means
Authorities must establish that less intrusive measures are insufficient and must limit target, duration, scope, and review.
21. Restoration
Every intervention must provide a path for termination, restoration, reinstatement of status, and record correction.
PART VI｜CLINICAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY
22. Pain Reduction ≠ Recovery
Reduced suffering, quietness, compliance, or lower risk score alone does not establish therapeutic success.
23. Trauma Memory
Deletion of trauma memory is not the default treatment. Buffering, gating, or voluntary reconsolidation may be used according to the person's own goals.
24. Calibration Safety
Wrong, stolen, or outdated profiles; cross-person calibration; and version misassignment are intervention safety incidents.
25. Embodiment Boundary
Changes in embodiment do not automatically determine identity continuity.
PART VII｜AUDIT / REMEDY
26. Intervention Ledger
Record authority, consent, target, version, parameters, operator, duration, outcome, adverse effects, and stop or reversal events.
27. Independent Review
Major or compulsory interventions must be reviewable by independent rights, judicial, or clinical-technical bodies.
28. Civil Remedy
Unauthorized reading or writing, target drift, erroneous profiles, or coercive manipulation may create damages and restoration liability under the Civil Code.